Efficacy of electro-acupuncture versus sham acupuncture for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: study protocol for a three-armed randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Specific treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is still lacking, and acupuncture may relieve the symptoms. We intend to investigate the efficacy and safety of electro-acupuncture (EA) in alleviating symptoms associated with DPN in diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, three-armed, participant- and assessor-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial will recruit 240 eligible participants from four hospitals in China and will randomly assign (1:1:1) them to EA, sham acupuncture (SA) or usual care (UC) group. Participants in the EA and SA groups willl receive either 24-session EA or SA treatment over 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow-up period, while participants in the UC group will be followed up for 16 weeks. The primary outcome of this trial is the change in DPN symptoms from baseline to week 8, as rated by using the Total Symptom Score. The scale assesses four symptoms: pain, burning, paraesthesia and numbness, by evaluating the frequency and severity of each. All results will be analysed with the intention-to-treat population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (Identifier: 2022BZYLL0509). Every participant will be informed of detailed information about the study before signing informed consent. The results of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200061408.

Single Session Effects of Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Targeting Two Brain Regions on Pain Perception in Patients with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: Painful diabetic neuropathy (pDN) is the most common cause of neuropathic pain (NP) in the United States. Prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), is quick (1-4 minutes) and tolerable for most individuals, compared to high frequency rTMS and can modulate pain thresholds in healthy participants. However, its effects on patients with chronic pain are still unclear. The primary purpose of this preliminary study is to investigate the effects of single session pcTBS targeted at the primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on a set of self-report measures of pain (SRMP) that assess the (a) sensory-discriminative; (b) affective-motivational; and (c) cognitive-evaluative aspects of pain experience. METHODS: For this prospective, single-blind study, forty-two participants with pDN were randomized to receive either pcTBS targeting the M1 or the DLPFC brain regions. SRMP were completed at baseline, post pcTBS and 24h-post pcTBS. A two-way mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance (2 brain regions by 3 time points) was conducted to evaluate the effects of pcTBS stimulation at M1 and DLPFC for each subscale of each SRMP. RESULTS: After a single session of pcTBS targeted at M1 or DLPFC in patients with pDN, statistically significant improvements from baseline to post pcTBS and baseline to 24 h-post pcTBS were observed for different SRMP subscales examining the (a) sensory-discriminative, (b) affective-motivational and (c) cognitive-evaluative components of the pain experience. At 24 h-post pcTBS, none of the participants reported any serious adverse events to the pcTBS treatment, thus demonstrating its feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: In pDN patients with NP, our study results demonstrated significant improvement in scores on self-report measures of pain (SRMP) after a single session of pcTBS targeting the M1 and DLPFC brain regions. Future studies should consider utilizing multiple sessions of pcTBS to evaluate its long-term effects on pain perception, safety and tolerability in patients with chronic pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website (NCT04988321).

Electroacupuncture efficacy in diabetic polyneuropathy: Study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); its diagnosis and treatment are based on symptomatic improvement. However, as pharmacological therapy causes multiple adverse effects, the implementation of acupunctural techniques, such as electroacupuncture (EA) has been suggested as an alternative treatment. Nonetheless, there is a lack of scientific evidence, and its mechanisms are still unclear. We present the design and methodology of a new clinical randomized trial, that investigates the effectiveness of EA for the treatment of DPN. METHODS: This study is a four-armed, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial (20-week intervention period, plus 12 weeks of follow-up after concluding intervention). A total of 48 T2DM patients with clinical signs and symptoms of DPN; and electrophysiological signs in the Nerve Conduction Study (NCS); will be treated by acupuncture specialists in outpatient units in Mexico City. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following four groups: (a) short fibre DPN with EA, (b) short fibre DPN with sham EA, (c) axonal DPN with EA and (d) axonal DPN with sham EA treatment. The intervention will consist of 32 sessions, 20 min each, per patient over two cycles of intervention of 8 weeks each and a mid-term rest period of 4 weeks. The primary outcome will be NCS parameters, and secondary outcomes will include DPN-related symptoms and pain by Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI), Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS), Dolour Neuropatique Score (DN-4), Semmes-Westein monofilament, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain assessment, and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). To measure quality of life and improve oxidative stress, the inflammatory response; and genetic expression; will be analysed at the beginning and at the end of treatment. DISCUSSION: This study will be conducted to compare the efficacy of EA versus sham EA combined with conventional diabetic and neuropathic treatments if needed. EA may improve NCS, neuropathic pain and symptoms, oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and genetic expression, and it could be considered a potential coadjutant treatment for the management of DPN with a possible remyelinating effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05521737 Registered on 30 August 2022. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) ISRCTN97391213 Registered on 26 September 2022 [2b].

Electroacupuncture alleviates streptozotocin-induced diabetic neuropathic pain via suppressing phosphorylated CaMKIIα in rats.

Diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP) is a frequent complication of diabetes. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II α (CaMKIIα), a multi-functional serine/threonine kinase subunit, is mainly located in the surface layer of the spinal cord dorsal horn (SCDH) and the primary sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Numerous studies have indicated electroacupuncture (EA) takes effect in various kinds of pain. In this research, we explored whether CaMKIIα on rats' SCDH and DRG participated in DNP and further explored the mechanisms underlying the analgesic effects of EA. The DNP model in rats was successfully established by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin. Certain DNP rats were treated with intrathecal injections of KN93, a CaMKII antagonist, and some of the DNP rats received EA intervention. The general conditions, behaviors, the expressions of CaMKIIα and phosphorylated CaMKIIα (p-CaMKIIα) were evaluated. DNP rats' paw withdrawal threshold was reduced and the expressions of p-CaMKIIα in SCDH and DRG were upregulated compared with the Normal group, while the level of CaMKIIα showed no significance. KN93 attenuated DNP rats' hyperalgesia and reduced the expressions of p-CaMKIIα. We also found EA attenuated the hyperalgesia of DNP rats and reduced the expressions of p-CaMKIIα. The above findings suggest that p-CaMKIIα in SCDH and DRG is involved in DNP. The analgesic effect of EA in DNP might be related to the downregulation of p-CaMKIIα expression level. Our study further supports that EA can be an effective clinical treatment for DNP.

Effect of exercise training on glycemic control in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

AIMS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of exercise training on HbA1c, and on fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). METHODS: Two independent researchers performed a systematic search in the electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Studies investigating the effect of exercise training on patients diagnosed with DPN using a randomized-controlled design were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 1254 retrieved studies, 68 studies were identified to undergo full-text review; out of these a total of 13 randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies assessed HbA1c, 8 fasting plasma-glucose concentration, and 3 postprandial plasma-glucose concentration. Overall, exercise training significantly decreased HbA1c [-0.54% (95% CI -0.78 to -0.31%)], fasting plasma glucose [-32.6 mg/dl [-1.8 mmol/L] (-44.2 to -20.9 mg/dl [-2.4 to -1.1 mmol/L])] and postprandial plasma glucose [-67.5 mg/dl [-3.7 mmol/L] (-129.5 to -5.4 mg/dl [-7.1 to -0.3 mmol/L])]. Studies with aerobic training intervention yielded the largest significant mean reduction in HbA1c (-0.75%) and fasting plasma glucose concertation (34.0 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: aerobic training is the most effective modality to reduces HbA1c, fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentration in patients with DPN. From a metabolic perspective, the magnitude precision range of the reduction in HbA1c is of clinical importance for patients with DPN. This area of research warrants further attention to investigate the impact of various exercise modalities on glycemic control. Registration number CRD42023413687.

Spectrum of Diabetic Neuropathy: New Insights in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Diabetic neuropathy is a highly prevalent complication of diabetes. It consists of a broad range of neuropathic conditions, such as distal symmetric polyneuropathy and various forms of autonomic neuropathies involving the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and urogenital systems. Prevention or diagnosis in early stages of disease is crucial to prevent symptomatic onset and progression, particularly in the absence of current disease-modifying therapies. In this review, we describe the four main types of diabetic neuropathy. We review current understanding with respect to diagnosis and treatment while highlighting knowledge gaps and future directions.

4. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Pain as a symptom of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) significantly lowers quality of life, increases mortality and is the main reason for patients with diabetes to seek medical attention. The number of people suffering from painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) has increased significantly over the past decades. METHODS: The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy was retrieved and summarized. RESULTS: The etiology of PDPN is complex, with primary damage to peripheral nociceptors and altered spinal and supra-spinal modulation. To achieve better patient outcomes, the mode of diagnosis and treatment of PDPN evolves toward more precise pain-phenotyping and genotyping based on patient-specific characteristics, new diagnostic tools, and prior response to pharmacological treatments. According to the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert Group, a presumptive diagnosis of "probable PDPN" is sufficient to initiate treatment. Proper control of plasma glucose levels, and prevention of risk factors are essential in the treatment of PDPN. Mechanism-based pharmacological treatment should be initiated as early as possible. If symptomatic pharmacologic treatment fails, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) should be considered. In isolated cases, where symptomatic pharmacologic treatment and SCS are unsuccessful or cannot be used, sympathetic lumbar chain neurolysis and/or radiofrequency ablation (SLCN/SLCRF), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGs) or posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) may be considered. However, it is recommended that these treatments be applied only in a study setting in a center of expertise. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of PDPN evolves toward pheno-and genotyping and treatment should be mechanism-based.

Effect of cold application versus transcutaneous nerve stimulation on chemotherapy induced diabetic peripheral neuropathy post mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of chemotherapy-induced diabetic peripheral neuropathy (CIDPN) are rather prevalent. There is no known pharmaceutical treatment that can stop CIDPN. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of cold application and transcutaneous nerve stimulation (Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)) on individuals who had undergone mastectomy following CIDPN. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between Mars 2021 and September 2021, a randomised controlled experiment was carried out at physical therapy clinics at the Modern University for Technology and Information. 30 patients were randomly split into two equal groups (A and B). Both lower limbs received cold application (Group A) three times per week for 12 weeks and TENS application (Group B) three times each week for 12 weeks. The Visual Analogue Scale and nerve conduction velocity for the sural nerve were used to assess patients before and after 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: The results showed that Group A significantly (p < 0.05) decreased pain intensity after treatment by 70.83% compared with Group B by 55.17%. Moreover, Group A improved significantly (p < 0.05) the sural nerve amplitude by 44.12% compared with group B which recorded 26.87%. After treatment, both pain intensity and sural nerve amplitude significantly (p < 0.05) changed between Group A versus Group B. CONCLUSION: Cold application has a better effect on pain in CIDPN post mastectomy.

Novel therapeutical approaches based on neurobiological and genetic strategies for diabetic polyneuropathy - A review.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathy is among the most often reported consequences of diabetes and the biggest cause of morbidity and mortality in people suffering from this life-long disease. Although different therapeutic methods are available for diabetic neuropathy, it is still the leading cause of limb amputations, and it significantly decreases patients' quality of life. AIM: This study investigates potential novel therapeutic options that could ameliorate symptoms of DN. METHODOLOGY: Research and review papers from the last 10 years were taken into consideration. RESULTS: There are various traditional drugs and non-pharmacological methods used to treat this health condition. However, the research in the area of pathogenic-oriented drugs in the treatment of DN showed no recent breakthroughs, mostly due to the limited evidence about their effectiveness and safety obtained through clinical trials. Consequently, there is an urgent demand for the development of novel therapeutic options for diabetic neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Some of the latest novel diagnostic methods for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy are discussed as well as the new therapeutic approaches, such as the fusion of neuronal cells with stem cells, targeting gene delivery and novel drugs.

Personal Activity Intelligence eHealth intervention in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) report difficulty exercising. This study tested an innovative intervention to promote physical activity self-management and its impact on foot symptoms. METHOD: Ten adults with DPN not meeting exercise guidelines consented to four weekly sessions involving exercise tasters, behaviour change counselling and Physical Activity Intelligence (PAI) self-monitoring, with a goal to maintain daily PAI scores ≥100. Foot symptoms were assessed using repeated mobile phone surveys at 0 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Participants attended a mean 3.5 sessions and achieved 100 PAI on 53% and 15% of days during Weeks 2-4 and 5-12, respectively. No major adverse events and large reductions in aching (P=0.02) and burning pain (P=0.03) in the feet were recorded. DISCUSSION: The PAI eHealth intervention was feasible and safe and might reduce foot symptoms. More work is needed to support self-directed exercise maintenance.

Reliability of a novel point of care device for monitoring diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

We aimed to assess DPNCheck's reliability for repeated sural nerve conduction (NC) parameters. This post hoc analysis used data from the randomized controlled ACUDPN trial assessing NC of the N. Suralis every eight weeks over a 6-month period in 62 patients receiving acupuncture against diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) symptoms. The reliability of DPNCheck for nerve conduction velocity and amplitude was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and was calculated using data from single time points and repeated measures design. The results of the NC measurements were correlated with the Total Neuropathy Score clinical (TNSc). Overall, for both nerve velocity and amplitude, the reliability at each measurement time point can be described as moderate to good and the reliability using repeated measures design can be described as moderate. Nerve velocity and amplitude showed weak correlation with TNSc. DPNCheck's reliability results question its suitability for monitoring DPN's progression. Given the limitation of our analysis, a long-term, pre-specified, fully crossed study should be carried out among patients with DPN to fully determine the suitability of the device for DPN progression monitoring. This was the first analysis assessing the reliability of the DPNCheck for DPN progression monitoring using data from multiple collection time points.

Effects of acupuncture therapy in diabetic neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in relieving diabetic neuropathic pain and to establish a more reliable and efficient foundation for acupuncture practice in diabetes care. METHODS: The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Chongqing Weipu, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were all searched for a randomized controlled trial research of acupuncture for DNP. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction. After selecting studies and extracting data, we conducted the data analysis using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0. The quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: An extensive review of 19 studies involving 1276 patients up to April 29, 2023, found that acupuncture was successful in improving pain intensity [MD= -1.09; 95% CI (-1.28, -0.89), P < 0.00001], clinical efficacy indicating pain changes [RR= 1.22; 95% CI (1.15, 1.29), P < 0.00001], and clinical neuropathy [MD= -1.55; 95% CI ( -3.00, -0.09), P = 0.04] in DNP patients. Quality of life was also improved, with few side effects reported. CONCLUSION: According to this meta-analysis, acupuncture therapy significantly improved the clinical efficacy of pain intensity, pain changes, and clinical neuropathy in patients with DNP, improved the quality of life of patients to a certain extent, and had lower side effects. This discovery provides evidence-based and practical recommendations for the treatment of DNP patients.

Diabetic Neuropathies.

OBJECTIVE: This article provides an up-to-date review of the diagnosis and management of the most common neuropathies that occur in patients with diabetes. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: The prevalence of diabetes continues to grow worldwide and, as a result, the burden of diabetic neuropathies is also increasing. Most diabetic neuropathies are caused by hyperglycemic effects on small and large fiber nerves, and glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes reduces neuropathy prevalence. However, among people with type 2 diabetes, additional factors, particularly metabolic syndrome components, play a role and should be addressed. Although length-dependent distal symmetric polyneuropathy is the most common form of neuropathy, autonomic syndromes, particularly cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, are associated with increased mortality, whereas lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy and treatment-induced neuropathy cause substantial morbidity. Recent evidence-based guidelines have updated the recommended treatment options to manage pain associated with distal symmetric polyneuropathy of diabetes. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Identifying and appropriately diagnosing the neuropathies of diabetes is key to preventing progression. Until better disease-modifying therapies are identified, management remains focused on diabetes and metabolic risk factor control and pain management.

Quantitative assessment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy after high-frequency spinal cord stimulation: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Randomized trials have demonstrated efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Preliminary data suggested that treatment of PDN with high-frequency SCS resulted in improvements on neurological examination. The purpose of the present study was to explore whether patients with PDN treated with high-frequency SCS would have improvements in lower-extremity peripheral nerve function. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study in an outpatient clinical practice at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Patients with PDN were treated with high-frequency SCS and followed up for 12 months after SCS implantation with clinical outcomes assessments of pain intensity, neuropathic symptoms, and neurological function. Small-fiber sudomotor function was assessed with the quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART), and large-fiber function was assessed with nerve conduction studies (NCS). Lower-extremity perfusion was assessed with laser Doppler flowmetry. RESULTS: Nine patients completed 12-month follow-up visits and were observed to have improvements in lower-extremity pain, weakness, and positive sensory symptoms. Neuropathy impairment scores were improved, and 2 patients had recovery of sensory responses on NCS. A reduction in sweat volume on QSART was observed in the proximal leg but not at other sites. No significant differences were noted in lower-extremity perfusion or NCS as compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in pain relief was concordant with improvement in neuropathy symptoms. The findings from this study provide encouraging preliminary data in support of the hypothesis of a positive effect of SCS on peripheral neuropathy, but the findings are based on small numbers and require further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03769675.

High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz) alters sensory function and nerve fiber density in painful diabetic neuropathy: a pilot prospective open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz has provided effective pain relief and improved function in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This study aims to confirm the clinical outcomes for 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy and explore its impact on objective quantitative measures of nerve pathology and function. METHODS: This single-academic center, prospective, open-label, observational study examined the pain relief success of 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation in patients >18 years of age with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Patients underwent skin biopsies to measure intra-epidermal nerve fiber densities and corneal confocal microscopy measurements before implantation and at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Numerical rating scale for pain, visual analog scale, neuropathy pain scale, Short Form-36, and Neuropen (pin prick and monofilament) assessments were also conducted. RESULTS: Eight patients met the criteria and were enrolled in the study. A successful trial was achieved in 7 subjects, and 6 completed the study. Significant pain relief (P < .001) was achieved at all follow-up visits. Neurological assessments showed reduced numbers of "absent" responses and increased "normal" responses from baseline to 12 months. Both proximal and distal intra-epidermal nerve fiber densities were higher at 12 months than at baseline (P < .01). Confocal microscopy measurements showed a steady increase in nerve density from baseline (188.8% increase at 12 months; P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: We observed pain relief and improvements in sensory function after stimulation that were accompanied by increases in lower-limb intra-epidermal nerve fiber density and corneal nerve density. Further evaluation with a blinded and controlled study is needed to confirm the preliminary findings in this study.

Efficacy of scrambler therapy in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A single-arm, prospective, pilot study.

BACKGROUND: A variety of medications are available to manage painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), but the proper treatment remains challenging. Accordingly, various neuromodulation modalities have been used. However, no prospective clinical trials have evaluated the use of scrambler therapy (ST) in painful DPN. This study aimed to explore the long-term effects of ST in managing painful DPN. METHODS: The patients received 10 consecutive STs of 45 minutes every 1 to 2 days. The primary outcome was pain score. We measured the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at baseline, during ST, immediately after ST, and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after ST. The secondary outcomes were Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI), Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scores, which were measured at baseline, immediately after ST, and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after ST. RESULTS: VAS scores showed significant improvement at the 8th, 9th, and 10th sessions during ST and 1 month after ST. The MNSI self-report component score was decreased 1 month after the ST. However, all other outcomes did not show significant differences compared to the baseline. CONCLUSION: ST may have short-term effects and limited long-term effects on painful DPN.